Tuesday, August 31, 2010

US.2- Who Likes Drama? JJ Likes Drama.



"Bonzai!!!!!"

Does anyone else get the feeling that that's pretty close to what Jelena Jankovic shouted this morning as she left her hotel and jumped into the courtesy car that would take her to the USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center?

Maybe not, but she may as well have. Not that the notion that it might happen before THIS U.S. Open is any different from any potential scenarios before any of the others she's played. Actually, the same goes for all her other slam appearances. Umm, and most of her regular tour stops, too. Every time she steps onto a court, an adventure is possible. Hey, JJ can't help it. She's got chaos in her Serbian bones.

And that's why we love her so much... no matter how many times we've imagined clunking her over the head with whatever was within arm's reach while we were watching her do things like she did today in her 1st Round match against Romania's Simona Halep.

The '08 U.S. Open runner-up found herself where she often is in the early stages of a slam -- with her hands full. 18-year old Halep entered today with only two Top 50 wins in her career (with her best having come at the expense of countrywoman Sorana Cirstea), but she more than threatened to make world #5 Jankovic's the new prize WTA pelt on the wall of her family's den.

But, remember, we ARE talking about Jelena.

Jankovic won the 1st set 6-4, but as her first serve percentage went down and her double fault/unforced error totals went up, the course was reversed in a hurry. Halep went up 4-0 and 5-1 in the 2nd, and managed to hold on even as JJ closed the gap on the scoreboard, winning 6-4 to knot the match. As the Serb was looking for all those uninformed in the "ways of JJ" that she was likely to be the first women's seed dumped from this event, the Romanian was sensing a truly big moment in her career (and getting a code violation levied against her for coaching).

In other words, it was your typical Queen Chaos match.

As the 3rd set wore on, the first truly gripping heat of this Open settled down and began to strangle the life out of the proceedings. In the afternoon, the "heat rules" went into effect for what will likely be the first of many times at Flushing Meadows over the next two weeks. As anyone on the east coast of the U.S. this summer knows from the past few months (more than once the temps have hit 108-degrees at Backspin HQ!), the heat of 2010 is nothing to sneeze at. Pass out to? Yes. Sneeze at? Never. Halep would eventually learn this the hard way, but not before she had the chance to serve for the match at 5-4. At 30/30, she was two points from the 2nd Round.

But it wasn't meant to be. JJ grabbed a slight advantage in the game, quickly gave it back, then seized it again on her second chance. It was 5-5, even as Jankovic was edging close to fifty UE's for the match. From there, the Serb did what she's always found a way to do -- keep her opponent moving, wear her down and wait for her to find a way to lose a match. She's perfected the practice over the years, and it came in handy in the heat today. After being so close to victory, the Romanian wilted -- literally and figuratively -- down the stretch of the final set. And JJ watched it happen from over the net. From love/30, Jankovic held serve for 6-5, then broke the physically-at-her-limit Halep at love to win 6-4/4-6/7-5 in the 2:19 match.

The drama bled over into the next match up on Ashe, as the all-Serb match-up between Novak Djokovic and Viktor Troicki nearly became the story of the tournament so far. Djokovic went down 2-1 in sets, and almost found himself down a double-break in the 4th. But, like JJ, he, too, held on and his opponent wilted down the stretch in the adverse conditions to advance in five sets.

Blame it on Jelena, Novak -- she warped the mojo of Ashe. Well, maybe he should THANK her. He did win, after all. As for match #3 on Ashe? Well, as I'm writing this Maria Sharapova just wrote a virtual note to herself to crib a similar thank-you to her fellow WTA star after her own go-the-distance 1st Round victory. (But I'll discuss that more later on tonight.)

In the end, Jankovic simply used Day 2 to get her bearings after a less-than-lackluster, injury-tinged summer, throw her hat into the ring for Zombie Queen honors for this slam, AND notch an early-round credit point in the race for the first-ever "Broadway-Bound" award in one fell swoop. You know, just what I and everyone else who keeps track of the wacky world of Queen Chaos expected before the first ball was ever struck in this tournament.

Ah, at least SOME things aren't absent from this Open, huh?



=DAY 2 NOTES=
...for a while, it looked possible that both Jankovic AND Svetlana Kuznetsova might be on their way out of this tournament before both pulled their matches back and put away three-set victories. Kuznetsova downed 39-year old Japanese vet Kimiko Date-Krumm, 6-2/4-6/6-1.

In other results of note, 28-year old Mirjana Lucic, a Wimbledon semifinalist in '99 (along with fellow surprise Final Four-er Alexandra Stevenson that year at SW19), notched her first slam main draw victory in eight years (and her first at the Open in eleven) when the '10 Open qualifier defeated Alicia Molik 7-6/6-1 today. Also, Yanina Wickmayer, a semifinalist at Flushing Meadows last year who is flying so low under the radar this time around that Pam Shriver might have actually forgotten who she is (well, all right, that might not take any super stealth effort from the Belgian, now that I think about it). Shriver was great in the stands with Martina Navratilova on Day 1, though (even if some of the mugging facial expressions were slightly unnerving).

Speaking of Shriver, she was modeling a wonderfully horrible hat to protect herself from the searing New York heat today on ESPN2. I know I couldn't avoid uttering, "That's some bad hat, Harry"... err, I mean, Pammy, when she did it.

(That's a Roy Scheider quote from the original "Jaws," by the way... but you can see an animated version of that scene in the production company logo positioned at the end of every episode of "House." Ah, tennis and TV end credit trivia, too. Wow.)

...finally, the first women's seed was dumped out of the 1st Round late in the afternoon on Day 2, and it was #8 Li Na, a semifinalist in the first slam of the '10 season in Melbourne. Kateryna Bondarenko won their three-set match 2-6/6-4/6-2. Unless the Ukrainian pulls off a stunning career-best slam run, Li's "unGrand Slam" string of losing to the eventual champion at four straight slams will now come to a merciful end.

Then again, K-Bond DID play Wickmayer last year in the QF for a berth in the Open semifinals. So, you know, MAYBE. Nahhhh.

The Chinese veteran's loss served as an air-filled balloon finally being let go to spiral around the room, as the tournament's second women's seed to fall came soon afterward when the similarly-hard-to-read-on-a-weekly-basis #26-seed Lucie Safarova went down in three sets to qualifer Tamira Paszek, who's quietly making a comeback from her recent troubles. And the Austrian, even though she's seemingly been around forever, is STILL only 19 years old. I guess that sort of messing-with-time thing happens when a player wins a WTA singles title at age 15, huh?

Not long after that, qualifier Lourdes Dominguez-Lino took out #30 Yaroslava Shvedova.

Meanwhile, Urszula Radwanska looks to finally be emerging from the darkness of her injury-damaged season. Today, she knocked off '07 Open semifinalist Anna Chakvetadze -- the good-form winner of that $100K challenger in the Bronx this weekend -- in the 1st Round today by a shockingly easy score of 6-3/6-3.

Wild card Beatrice Capra's win over Karolina Sprem runs the total of 1st Round wins by qualifiers/wild cards to ten (8/2), with a handful more still to finish tonight.

...QUICK!! Someone get some ChapStick to the ESPN2 set!! STAT!! Hannah Storm and Darren Cahill will most surely be in need of it after kissing James Blake's butt as much as they were during the brief coverage of his 1st Round match.

...during Venus Williams' match on Monday night, Mary Carillo shared some previously unknown information about Serena Williams' foot injury. She said it occurred while Serena was in a bar in Munich when Germany was eliminated from the World Cup. Needless to say, it was a bit rowdy. Wearing sandals, Williams stepped on glass (probably a broken beer bottle?) and a shard went an inch deep into her foot, resulting in a very bloody injury. She went ahead and played the Belgian exhibition, then went immediately home for real medical attention.

Yet another reason to turn a blind eye to soccer, I'd say.

...a little housekeeping from this weekend's "Bare Bones Backspin": in the $10K challenger in Portschauch, Austria, Julia Mayr defeated her sister Evelyn 6-3/6-1 in the final. The Italian siblings also won the doubles title.

...and, finally, after Serena Williams was the first (and only) woman to ever get the "main attraction," second-up match spot during a night session a year ago, it's only taken until Day 2 for the set-up to become a reality this year. Top-seeded Caroline Wozniacki will take on NCAA champion Chelsey Gullickson (both are 20 years old, with the Georgia Bulldog sophomore having celebrated the big two-oh on Sunday) tonight after the completion of Rafael Nadal's 1st Rounder.

I'll post a second, after-hours version of Backspin tonight, following the "Late Night with Caroline (& Chelsey, too)" match on Ashe. I'll talk about the Maria Sharapova/Jarmila Groth match, as well, and will tie up any other potential loose ends that weren't covered here.





*SLAM "FIRST SEEDS OUT"*
[2010]
AO: #14 Maria Sharapova (lost to Kirilenko)
RG: #10 Victoria Azarenka (lost to Dulko)
WI: #5 Francesca Schiavone (lost to Dushevina)
US: #8 Li Na (lost to K.Bondarenko)
[U.S. Open]
2005 #28 Flavia Pennetta, ITA (lost to Shruff)
2006 #15 Anna-Lena Groenefeld, GER (lost to Rezai)
2007 #29 Samantha Stosur, AUS (lost to Cornet)
2008 #24 Shahar Peer, ISR (lost to Li)
2009 #25 Kaia Kanepi, EST (lost to Chang)
2010 #8 Li Na, CHN (lost to K/Bondarenko)




TOP QUALIFIER: Michelle Larcher de Brito/POR
TOP EARLY ROUND (1r-2r): xxx
TOP MIDDLE-ROUND (3r-QF): xxx
TOP LATE ROUND (SF-F): xxx
TOP QUALIFYING MATCH: Q1: Laura Robson/GBR d. #2q Jelena Dokic/AUS 6-1/6-4
TOP EARLY RD. MATCH (1r-2r): xxx
TOP MIDDLE-RD. MATCH (3r-QF): xxx
TOP LATE RD. MATCH (SF-F/Jr.): xxx
TOP NIGHT MATCH: xxx
=============================
FIRST WINNER: #6 Francesca Schiavone/ITA (def. Ayumi Morita/JPN)
FIRST SEED OUT: #8 Li Na/CHN (lost to Kateryna Bondarenko/UKR)
UPSET QUEENS: xxx
REVELATION LADIES: xxx
LAST QUALIFIER STANDING: xxx
IT GIRL: xxx
MS. OPPORTUNITY: xxx
COMEBACK PLAYER: xxx
CRASH & BURN: xxx
ZOMBIE QUEEN: xxx
LAST AMERICAN STANDING: xxx
LADY OF THE EVENING: xxx
BROADWAY-BOUND: xxx
DOUBLES STAR xxx
JUNIOR BREAKOUT: xxx




All for Day 2. More tonight.

Read more...

Monday, August 30, 2010

US.1- Episode One: "Confusing Jada"



Welcome to the new television reality series, "Are You My Mommy?"

Truthfully, it was hard to tell what to make of defending U.S. Open champion Kim Clijsters on Day 1 of the 2010 edition. In winning in Cincinnati a few weeks ago, Jada's Mama showed once again that the North American hard courts are where her tennis heart resides. At that moment, she looked like a good bet to defend her crown at Flushing Meadows. Then she was bothered by an injured hip in Montreal (an eerie dose of deja vu, considering an injured wrist in Montreal prevented her from defending her Open title in '06), and the door was opened to question her ability to confidently rise to the occasion again in NYC after a season with just as many puzzling lows as ranking-elevating highs for the current world #3.

After today's match against Hungarian vet Greta Arn, the questions will persist.

Clijsters handily won the 1st set today 6-0, then saw her serve go off in the 2nd. Within mintues, Arn was up 4-0. Visions of the Belgian Barbie's collapse against Vera Zvonareva at Wimbledon earlier this summer, as well as was that stunning near-double bagel loss to Nadia Petrova at the Australian at the start of the year. Of course, one figured that Clijsters' Day 1 rut was just a temporary lapse in a match in which she shouldn't have much trouble. A hiccup that would soon pass. That WAS the case, too, as she charged back to win 6-0/7-5.

But there it is. During the match, an ESPN2 instant poll showed that neary 60% of the voters didn't think that Clijsters would defend her title, and it's dark patches like today's against Arn that are as good a reason as any to agree with the assertion. Focus and consistency (even in her big wins over Justine Henin earlier this season) have been lingering issues with Jada's Mama all season. Circa 2009, Mommy Dearest was able to go through BOTH Williams Sisters on her way to her second slam title.

But, at this instant, does anyone believe she's up to that level this time around? Of course, Clijsters might not have to be "Williams-worthy" to win a third Open. It's a good thing, I guess.

2010 has not included a KC Comeback upgrade. She says her hip isn't bothering her now, but will that be the case four, five, six matches into this tournament, in a long battle in which she'll have to use her legendary defensive skills and movement to stay in tough points? Will any slight tightness along the way put questions in her mind, and cause the sort of walkabout that briefly interrupted the proceedings today?

Time will tell, and we will watch for signs that will tell us with some measure of certainty which of Jada's Mommies has shown up at Flushing Meadows this year. And so will Caroline, and Maria, and Venus, and...



=DAY 1 NOTES=
...Melanie Oudin was back at her old (well, 2009) stomping grounds on Day 1. She won in fifty-six minutes, taking out Ukrainian Olga Savchuk 6-3/6-0. She'll get #29-seed Alona Bondarenko next.

Hmmm, last year, Little MO feasted on a steady diet of Russians at Flushing Meadows, might it be Ukrainians who are the Blue Plate Special at this Open? A-Bond, after all, is also Ukrainian. I guess SMALL changes ARE to be expected for Oudin one year later. Another? Rather than having "Believe" on her shoes, she has "Courage" this time around.

...though she nearly did, Oudin wasn' the FIRST player to notch a win this year at Flushing Meadows. That honor went to Roland Garros champ and #6 seed Francesca Schiavone, who handed young Japanese hopeful Ayumi Morita a headache-inducing 6-1/6-0 loss. Sports Illustrated's Jon Wertheim actually picked Morita over Schiavone as his 1st Round "Upset Special." So I'm happy to say that I didn't make the WORST prediction about this year's Open. Haha.

Then again, maybe I'd better shut up, huh? There's still plenty of prognostication dishonor left to be handed out over the next two weeks.

...in a rare instance for Day 1, as I write this, no women's seed has fallen. The closest: #29 Bondarenko defeated Vera Dushevina 6-0/5-7/6-4, #10 Victoria Azarenka survived a 2nd set stumble to defeat Monica Niculescu 6-0/5-7/6-1, and #5 Sam Stosur escaped her opening match against Elena Vesnina to grab a rare 1st Round Open victory for herself. The Russian won the 1st set 6-3 and opened the 2nd with a break, only to see Stosur come back to go up 3-1, and then go on to win the set in a tie-break. The Aussie then ran off with the 3rd set at 6-1.

...after I ranted a bit in Bare Bones Backspin and the Preview about Jelena Dokic's lack of a wild card into the main draw (and then subsequent loss in qualifying), reader Ian tried to keep me from vandalizing some Tennis Australia property by pointing me toward a story about how TA justified giving an Open WC to Sophie Ferguson. In a nutshell, when the decision was made (July 19/20), Ferguson was ranked higher, so she got the nod.

Sounds reasonable. Well, except for the fact that Dokic had just won the first of those three challenger titles she grabbed this summer immediately before the date that decision for the WC was supposedly made. The reason her ranking wasn't above Ferguson's at that instant was largely because of time missed with injury, and that single title proved that that was no longer the issue when it came to choosing the recipient of the "discretionary" berth from TA. Of course, the reason it's "discretionary" is because the spot can be awarded to the player who is the better "choice" for the spot, ranking be damned. Usually, this means a player with a good slam history will get the nod over a twenty-something player will little success (a low-ranked, young up-and-comer, though, might be justifiably picked, as well), and under those circumstances it's pretty clear who that SHOULD have been. If current ranking was the only rule then TA (or the USTA or French tennis organization) wouldn't even have had a say in choosing the players who got those eight spots in the draw -- they'd get automatic bids based on who's ranked highest.

TA using rankings -- even the rankings on July 19/20 -- as reason smells like a covering-their-butt move as much as anything else to me. History should have told the decision-makers that it was a wrong decision at the time, and what played out on the court over the next few weeks that followed shouldn't have made a difference. If nothing else, the decision should have been delayed for a week or so before being finalized, considering the choice was obviously between a mediocre Ferguson and a player who'd just reached a slam QF a year and a half ago and who'd just had a great result after a "coaching-up" period of adjustment this spring.

Dokic blew her chance to throw the decision back in TA's eye (something she'd likely have done verbally, and very publicly, years ago -- so it's a good continuing sign of her new it's-better-to-just-keep-your-mouth-shut maturity that she didn't cause a ruckus) by losing in qualifying, but it doesn't make the original TA decision any less wrong-headed. Just as Yanina Wickmayer's journey through qualifying at the Australian Open in January didn't erase the spectacular idiocy of not giving a wild card to a Top 20 player who'd been a semifinalist at the most recent slam because she didn't apply for one in time, which happened because she wasn't allowed to due to an ITF suspension that was thrown out of court and never actually enforced during the WTA season.

...Of course, here's where I note that "more-worthy-than-Jelena" Aussie WC Ferguson went down in flames today in the 1st Round to qualifier Maria Elena Camerin 6-4/6-0. She's now a combined 2-8 in slam main draw matches in her career.

Elsewhere, a handful of other qualifiers advanced on Day 1, as well. Luxembourg's Mandy Minella (def. Polona Hercog), Sania Mirza (over Backspin's Q-POW Michelle Larcher de Brito), Sally Peers (def. Aleksandra Wozniak) and Rebecca Marino (Ksenia Pervak) all reached the 2nd Round. Irina Falconi is still to play this evening against Flavia Pennetta.

...a few other interesting results:

-- after not winning a match (running her losing streak to six matches) since reaching the Wimbledon semifinals, Petra Kvitova finally woke up as another slam dawned. She defeated Lucie Hradecka in straight sets today. Fellow SW19 semifinalist Tsvetana Pironkova, who has also had a troubling post-Wimbledon summer, also won her 1st Round match today in straight sets over Renata Voracova. All-England Club quarterfinalist Kaia Kanepi (or, as ESPN2's graphics called her today, "Kinepi") plays tomorrow.

-- Dinara Safina's win in New Haven over Daniela Hantuchova last week meant nothing today, as the Slovak won 6-3/6-4. After putting up a run of SF-RU-RU-SF results in four slams starting at the '08 U.S. Open, Safina has had 3rd-4th-1st-DNP-1st results since. Yikes.

...and, finally, the Flushing Meadows nighttime schedule -- the best time of the tennis season, in my opinion, as long as the schedulers don't punt their duty and give us a steady diet of non-competitve match-ups simply because of the name recognition of the favorites -- gets underway tonight. Martina Navratilova (great), perennial Wheelchair champion Esther Vergeer (good for the USTA), and James Blake (well, at least he'll have one positive moment at this slam, I suppose) have just been featured in the opening ceremonies on a TV screen I'm looking at now out of the corner of my eye.

Later, after Gloria Estefan performs, Venus Williams and Roger Federer will take to Ashe court for their '10 debuts. Venus, in particular, will be watched closely, as we haven't seen her since Wimbledon. She has a great opportunity to silence some critics at this Open, if her body is sound. Ditto for Federer. It would seem that Federer is far more likely to lift another singles championship trophy, though.

The Venus/Roger combo is a collective 36-3 in scheduled night session matches (Federer is 13-0), so there's probably little news to be made once the sun goes down on the USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center tonight.

(Oh, but I DID just learn that that hoped-for night match between Wozniacki and NCAA champ Chelsey Gullickson had indeed been scheduled for Night 2. Nice.)





*SLAM "FIRST SEEDS OUT"*
[2010]
AO: #14 Maria Sharapova (lost to Kirilenko)
RG: #10 Victoria Azarenka (lost to Dulko)
WI: #5 Francesca Schiavone (lost to Dushevina)
US: xx
[U.S. Open]
2005 #28 Flavia Pennetta, ITA (lost to Shruff)
2006 #15 Anna-Lena Groenefeld, GER (lost to Rezai)
2007 #29 Samantha Stosur, AUS (lost to Cornet)
2008 #24 Shahar Peer, ISR (lost to Li)
2009 #25 Kaia Kanepi, EST (lost to Chang)
2010 xx

*2010 SLAM "FIRST WINS"*
AO: Dinara Safina, RUS (def. Rybarikova)
RG: Dominika Cibulkova, SVK (def. Ivanova)
WI: Chan Yung-Jan/TPE (def. Schnyder)
US: Francesca Schiavone/ITA (def. Morita)




TOP QUALIFIER: Michelle Larcher de Brito/POR
TOP EARLY ROUND (1r-2r): xxx
TOP MIDDLE-ROUND (3r-QF): xxx
TOP LATE ROUND (SF-F): xxx
TOP QUALIFYING MATCH: Q1: Laura Robson/GBR d. #2q Jelena Dokic/AUS 6-1/6-4
TOP EARLY RD. MATCH (1r-2r): xxx
TOP MIDDLE-RD. MATCH (3r-QF): xxx
TOP LATE RD. MATCH (SF-F/Jr.): xxx
TOP NIGHT MATCH: xxx
=============================
FIRST WINNER: #6 Francesca Schiavone/ITA (def. Ayumi Morita/JPN)
FIRST SEED OUT: xxx
UPSET QUEENS: xxx
REVELATION LADIES: xxx
LAST QUALIFIER STANDING: xxx
IT GIRL: xxx
MS. OPPORTUNITY: xxx
COMEBACK PLAYER: xxx
CRASH & BURN: xxx
ZOMBIE QUEEN: xxx
LAST AMERICAN STANDING: xxx
LADY OF THE EVENING: xxx
BROADWAY-BOUND: xxx
DOUBLES STAR xxx
JUNIOR BREAKOUT: xxx




All for Day 1. More tomorrow.

Read more...

Sunday, August 29, 2010

U.S. Open Preview: Sweet or Sour?



To be or not to be. That is the question.

Still, without the only two players who've managed to be dominating on-court figures over the past decade, leaving a field of talented-but-flawed survivors to contend for 2010's final grand slam singles crown in New York City, the collective women's half of the U.S. Open competition is faced with the task of determining whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune or to take arms against a sea of troubles.

In truth, there is nothing either overwhelmingly Good or Bad about the absence of Serena Williams and Justine Henin from this slam (or the unstable form of so many of the players best positioned to seize upon the opportunity presented by their nonattendance), but thinking it makes it so. As a result, that's the last time I'll longingly mention either of them while previewing this Open. This slam will be what it will be. It's up to the players who are HERE to make the most of their late summer trip to the big city.

Essentially, for the best of all concerned, "Rosencrantz and Guildenstern" are dead. They will be missed, but give thy thoughts no tongue. Instead, hold true to the notion that there are more things in heaven and earth, my friend, than are dreamt of in such a philosophy.

So...

The 2010 Open is a many-splendored thing. A slam that can be all things to all people. A few women -- or at least one -- is just going to have to work a little harder to make it so. Many will use the belief that the WTA tour lost its mirth this summer as an excuse to pay less attention to the goings-on in New York. But, really, maybe MORE attention should be payed. For, at the end of two weeks time, we'll have learned a great deal about many of the tour's personalities -- the would-be stars, veterans running out of time for glory, and others steadfastly attempting to reclaim their former better-loved positions in the sport -- than we can currently accurately surmise about their individual abilities to rise above the sort of things that so often lead to the easy comments that serve to denigrate the perceived quality of the women's game. What better place for a final exam than in the crucible of the city that doesn't sleep?

*U.S. OPEN FINALS EXPERIENCE*
[active in 2010 Open]
2-1...Kim Clijsters, BEL
2-2...Venus Williams, USA
1-0...Maria Sharapova, RUS
1-1...Svetlana Kuznetsova, RUS
0-1...Elena Dementieva, RUS
0-1...Jelena Jankovic, SRB
0-1...Caroline Wozniacki, DEN

The '10 Open has the chance to be one for the true fans, as they see players they've rooted for (or against) over the years, rise to the occasion and seize an opportunity to grab a slam crown under circumstances that aren't always going to exist. Usually, any number of "roadblocks" stand constructed to put an end to what is otherwise a career slam run destined to "come up short." Not this time. Francesca Schiavone triumped in a similar situation in Paris three months ago, and someone else who's always found an ultimate tennis prize just out of her grasp might just be able to get a get grip with two hands on one of her own at Flushing Meadows. Maybe one of the young stars will rise up, changing her career forever and giving birth a slew of new fans along the way. Or, quite possibly, a former champ will add another chapter to a Hall of Fame legacy.

Someone's career could very well be defined by what's about to happen in New York. "This above all: to thine own self be true" should be the motto of every one of the one hundred and twenty eight women involved in this mad dash. New stars, old favorites, and probably at least one unexpected "interloper" will be battling for history in early September. No one knows EXACTLY what's in store for this Open, and there's a certain thrilling freedom in that. It might not be what you want ALL the time, but on occasion it's a wonderful break from the "usual."

Expect nothing but the unexpected... and this Open might turn out to be something no one ever had any reason to worry about for even one moment.



(At least that's what the skull told me.)



Here's a quick overview of the draw, quarter-by-quarter:

(1)WOZNIACKI QUARTER: well, at the moment, there's not too much that seems rotten in the state of Denmark. One recent study designated the Danes as "the happiest people in the world," and it's very possible that they'll only strengthen their hold on the #1 spot two weeks from now. To sleep, perchance to dream -- ay, there's the rub. You see, in truth, this Open's top seed actually has the TOUGHEST quarter of the tournament's top four seeds. It's a good thing Caroline Wozniacki's game is looking so good right now, because she's going to need all her built-up confidence to get through (and hope she doesn't get tired after a 14-1 hard court summer run, or slowed down by the lower back tightness she experienced in the New Haven final, a condition that was likely brought on by so much action). If Maria Sharapova had her old "closing" toughness tucked away, and FULL good health (add a possible foot problem after Cincy to the mix), she'd probably be the favorite in this quarter. But the "Supernova" is still waiting in the wings, and it might be 2011 before she reappears in a slam in anything resembling complete form. The two blonde would-be poster children for this Open's first week could meet in the Round of 16, with the survivor getting Svetlana Kuznetsova, the potential dark horse champion of this event who already has one Open crown (2004) and a nice, healthy hard court summer to build on. This "Quarter of Death" trio would make up a good three-quarters of the semifinals, but only one can get there. If a mini battle of attrition turns out to mean that NONE of them reach the final four, it'd be truly shocking.
RANKS: 1.Wozniacki... 2.Kuznetsova... 3.Sharapova... 4.Li... 5.Chakvetadze
DANGEROUS: Groth & #30 Shvedova

(4)JANKOVIC QUARTER: to define true madness, what is't but to be nothing else but mad? How fitting is it that the oddest collection of potential semifinalists belongs to Queen Chaos herself? It's a shame that the '08 runner-up doesn't seem to be in position to take advantage of it. There are a slew of POSSIBLE worthy winners of this quarter, from Jankovic to Petrova to Zvonareva to '09 semifinalist Wickmayer. But none of them are a sure thing to bring their best game to each match at this tournament, what with their... umm, lets call them "volatile" tennis personalities... and it's difficult to see any of them winning a match in which that happens. Only Jankovic might be able to pick herself off the blue court and scratch out a win on truly bad day, but her body has really betrayed her over the course of what could have been a very rewarding summer for the former #1. Thus, if there's another unpredictable '10 slam semifinalist to be born at this Open, she'll probably come from this quarter. It would be great fun to see a Lucic or Lisicki (just because it'd be a stunning development for her to be able to play that many matches without a retirement/walkover) make that sort of run, but the devil hath power to assume a pleasing shape. Yet another "out-of-the-darkness" semifinalist (after the likes of a wild card Clijsters at last year's Open, a wild card Henin & Zheng in Oz, below-the-casual-fan's-radar Schiavone in Paris, and Pironkova & Kvitova at SW19) would only set the tour up to be the butt of another punchline about its perceived "lack of quality," I'm afraid. Oh, well. A-Rad could turn out to be the "compromise" who slips through.
RANKS: 1.Zvonareva... 2.Petrova... 3.Jankovic... 4.A.Radwanska... 5.Wickmayer
DANGEROUS: Lisicki (in a perfect world) & #31 Kanepi

(3)V.WILLIAMS QUARTER: something has to finally give in this quarter. Either Venus will make her long-awaited, late-career assault on a hard court slam, Victoria Azarenka will make her starting-to-become-overdue deep slam penetration, or Flavia Pennetta will get the moment in the sun that has somehow eluded her through the years. Of course, Venus hasn't played a point since Wimbledon. She's either very well rested or in no way ready to string together five, six or seven straight wins. In truth, the draw sets up rather perfectly for Azarenka to morph into Star-enka at this Open. She might not even have to face the likes of Venus, who she could meet in the QF. But, of course, Azarenka's been CLOSE to rising above the crowd at a slam before only to have a Williams Sister smack her back down to earth. Pennetta is the real intriguing contender here, but she's played twenty-three matches this 3rd Quarter, with varying degrees of success. It was as if she was banking on pre-Open success to make up for her possible inability to match her '09 QF result. Now, though, she's likely too tired to put on a great run, and she even had to give C-Woz a walkover in the New Haven QF due to a foot injury. Venus hasn't reached the final of a hard court slam since 2003, but if she proves to be 100% healthy it'd be hard to bet against her getting close. At least.
RANKS: 1.Azarenka... 2.V.Williams... 3.Pennetta... 4.Pavlyuchenkova... 5.Peer
DANGEROUS: #6 Schiavone & Szavay

(2)CLIJSTERS QUARTER: let me be cruel, not unnatural; I will speak daggers to her, but use none. Even though she's the defending champ, it's easy to overlook Clijsters on some level in this event. Unlike last season, she's not the new/old story to excite the masses and elicit clever headlines. This time around, she's the defending champ (for the first time ever at a slam, it should be noted) and arrives with a great deal of pressure to succeed in a field full of recent slam underachievers. Thing is, KC hasn't really come close to her '09 Open form since last September. The closest she's come, though, HAS been on the fast North American hard courts that so suit her game. She actually hasn't lost a U.S. Open match in six years, and has a far better draw as the #2 seed than Wozniacki has as the #1. At worst, she'd seem to be a lock for the QF. But. She hasn't been at her best in the slams in '10, losing in embarrassing fashion in Melbourne and crumbling against Zvonareva (of all people) at Wimbledon after knocking off an injured Henin one round earlier. If she reaches the final, I think she'll defend (and she'd likely have a nice head of steam if she's in the SF, too). But something makes me think she's going to stumble. The injured hip she suffered in Montreal, which she SAYS is fine, provides a nice "out" for a bad result here. There to pick up any potential quarter pieces might be Elena Dementieva, in her 47th career slam (more than any other slam-less player in the field with a legit chance to win) without a slam title, and ready to break the WTA record for ending a streak of slam futility if she were to find a way to win this tournament. The '10 air is ripe for a similar run, as Schiavone won RG in her 39th career slam appearance. The Russian's New Haven SF run was the best (and most) tennis she's played in many months, and she might be peaking at just the right moment to contend. Her SF loss at the Pilot Pen to C-Woz was both good (it showed she's still got it) and potentially bad (she still knows how to lose a close one, too), but it was something to gain encouragement from. If Clijsters falters in NYC, that result in Connecticut could turn out to be a prelude to a career legacy-changing moment for Punch-Sober.
RANKS: 1.Clijsters... 2.Dementieva... 3.Bartoli... 4.Kleybanova... 5.Zheng
DANGEROUS: Safina & Vesnina




=QUALIFYING ROUNDS=
TOP PLAYER: Michelle Larcher de Brito/POR
...the 17-year old opened qualifying by taking down Karolina Pliskova, then double-bageled #16 Anastasiya Yakimova before knocking out #23 Alexandra Panova to reach the main draw.
RISERS: Akgul Amanmuradova/UZB, Monica Niculescu/ROU & Olga Savchuk/UKR
SURPRISES: Maria Elena Camerin/ITA, Mandy Minella/LUX & Zuzana Kucova/SVK
VETERANS: Nuria Llagostera-Vives/ESP, Zuzana Ondraskova/CZE & Lourdes Dominguez-Lino/ESP
COMEBACKS: Mirjana Lucic/CRO, Sania Mirza/IND & Tamira Paszek/AUT
FRESH FACES: Irina Falconi/USA, Rebecca Marino/CAN & Sally Peers/AUS
DOWN: Jelena Dokic/AUS (1q), Varvara Lepchenko/USA (2q) and Evgeniya Rodina/RUS (3q)
WILD CARDS: Beatrice Capra/USA (won USTA playoff), Sophie Ferguson/AUS, Chelsey Gullickson/USA, Jamie Hampton/USA, Christina McHale/USA, Virginie Razzano/FRA, Shelby Rogers/USA, Coco Vandeweghe/USA
LUCKY LOSERS: none so far
OLDEST QUALIFIERS: Nuria Llagostera-Vives/ESP (30), Zuzana Ondraskova/CZE (30), Lourdes Dominguez-Lino/ESP (29)
YOUNGEST QUALIFIERS: Michelle Larcher de Brito/POR (17), Tamira Paszek/AUT (19), Rebecca Marino/CAN (19), Sally Peers/AUS (19)
YOUNGEST WILD CARDS: Shelby Rogers/USA (17), Beatrice Capra/USA (18), Coco Vandeweghe/USA (18)

=QUALIFYING MATCHES=
Q1: Robson d. #2 Dokic 6-1/6-4
...words, words, words. Still, she shouldn't even have been subjected to the qualifying game of hot potato.
Q2: Larcher de Brito d. #16 Yakimova 6-0/6-0
...sweets to the sweet? (Or maybe ear plugs?)
Q3: Marino d. Fichman 6-2/6-1
...Canadian vs. Canadien, but A-Woz was nowhere in sight.

*RECENT US OPEN "Q-PLAYER OF THE WEEK" WINNERS*
2006 Chan Yung-Jan, TPE
2007 Alina Jidkova, RUS
2008 Yaroslava Shvedova, KAZ & Barbora Zahlavova-Strycova, CZE
2009 Eva Hrdinova, CZE
2010 Michelle Larcher de Brito, POR

*2010 MULTIPLE SLAM QUALIFIERS*
[nations]
4...Russia
4...Spain
4...United States
3...Canada
3...Czech Republic
3...Japan
3...Romania
2...Australia
2...Austria
2...China
2...Estonia
2...Germany
2...Italy
2...Slovak Republic
2...Ukraine
[players]
3...NURIA LLAGOSTERA-VIVES, ESP (R/W/U)
2...Kaia Kanepi, EST (R/W)
2...MIRJANA LUCIC, CRO (W/U)
2...Kurumi Nara, JPN (R/W)
2...MONICA NICULESCU, ROU (W/U)
2...Shenay Perry, USA (A/W)



=POTENTIAL FIRST SEEDS OUT?=
[TOP HALF]
#14 Maria Sharapova vs. Jarmila Groth
...if it's under the lights, the big edge goes to Sharapova. If it's not, things could get really tight. The Russian has had really rotten luck when it comes to slam draws this year. Sharapova going out this early would really be something akin to murder most foul, you know?
#8 Li Na vs. Kateryna Bondarenko
...K-Bond probably isn't a threat to win the title, though. So Li won't likely have one of "those" weeks.
#18 Aravane Rezai vs. Magdalena Rybarikova
...Rezai's results have been all over the board this summer. The Opinionated Pastry beat Rybarikova in the 1st Round at Wimbledon, only to lose one match later.
#4 Jelena Jankovic vs. Simona Halep
...can she rise above her chaotic hard court summer?
#22 Maria Jose Martinez-Sanchez vs. (WC) Jamie Hampton
...what has happened to MJMS's season?
#25 Alexandra Dulgheru vs. Julie Coin
...Coin saved her career with a 3rd Round joyride (and win over AnaIvo) in NY two years ago.
[BOTTOM HALF]
#32 Tsvetana Pironkova vs. Renata Voracova
...Break my heart -- for I must hold my tongue. Your '10 Wimbledon semifinalist, ladies and gentlemen.
#5 Samantha Stosur vs. Elena Vesnina
...The lady doth protest too much, methinks. Stosur says her tired arm is better, but that doesn't explain the Playing-Like-Crap Syndrome that has infected her game since the Paris final. Vesnina, if her head is right, is a VERY dangerous 1st Round opponent, especially for a player with no history of success at the Open.
#24 Daniela Hantuchova vs. Dinara Safina
...Safina just beat Hantuchova in New Haven.

=LAST QUALIFIER STANDING?=
1. Olga Savchuk, UKR... she gets the slip-sliding Oudin in the 1st Round
2. Mirjana Lucic, CRO... for the former slam semifinalist (1999), a wobbly JJ could open a door wide
3. Akgul Amanmuradova, UZB... qualifier gets usual qualifier (but not this time) -- Scheepers -- first
4. Michelle Larcher de Brito, POR... she cut a wide swath through qualies, faces Mirza (Q) in 1st Rd.
5. Nuria Llagostera-Vives, ESP... if Benesova falters in 1st, NLV will hope Sharapova isn't there in 2nd
[LAST WILD CARD?]
1. Christina McHale, USA... fellow Bannerette Vania will have a say in the 1st Round, though
2. Jamie Hampton, USA... catching MJMS at the right time?
3. Coco Vandeweghe, USA... showed ability this summer to get big wins (vs. Lisicki in 1st, then Vera Z.)
4. Virginie Razzano, FRA... the most experienced of the W.C.'s (since Dokic got screwed over)
5. Sophie Ferguson, AUS... speaking of the anyone-but-Jelena Aussie WC pick, she gets Camerin in 1st
[LAST AMERICAN?]
1. Venus Williams, USA... hard to pick anyone but her, though her form is a total mystery
2. ?????... honestly, it's hard to see any other American as being solidly in the 3rd Rd. (maybe the McHale/King winner has a slight chance?) Alas, poor Melanie. I knew her, Horatio.

=A DOZEN INTRIGUING EARLY MATCHES=
1st Rd. - #1 Wozniacki vs. (WC) Ch.Gullickson
...the #1-seed vs. the NCAA champion. This has all the hallmarks of a tasty (and maybe more competitive, for at least a set, than some might be expecting) night session appetizer. If she loses here, Chelsey still her has doubles slam debut (with sister Carly, an Open Mixed Doubles champion a year ago) to look forward to.
1st Rd. - #11 Kuznetsova vs. Date-Krumm
...the nearly-40 year old isn't one to overlook.
1st Rd. - #29 A.Bondarenko vs. Dushevina
...an early-round loss would give newlywed A-Bond more time to see the town with Mr.Bondarenko.
1st Rd. - (WC) Vandeweghe vs. Lisicki
...frailty, thy name is Sabine? It'll be nice to just see Lisicki make it out of the 1st Round (win or lose) without injuring herself.
2nd Rd. - 13 Bartoli vs. (WC) Razzano
...as much ill will as an accidental meeting on the grounds between Virginie and that trainer who gave her that lawsuit-worthy massage?
3rd Rd. - #14 Sharapova vs. #18 Rezai
...it'd be fun, but why do I worry about EITHER of these making this date?
3rd Rd. - #3 V.Williams vs. #32 Pironkova
...it couldn't happen again, right?
3rd Rd. - #10 Azarenka vs. #20 Pavlyuchenkova
...a future grand slam final match-up? In my mind's eye, Horatio.
3rd Rd. - #12 Dementieva vs. Safina
...who'd have thought eighteen months ago that they could meet THIS early?
4th Rd. - #1 Wozniacki vs. #14 Sharapova
...CBS and ESPN2 are clasping hands and chanting "ummmmmmmmmmmmmmm" while hoping for the match to become reality, but also holding knives ready to stab the other in the back for the right to broadcast it.
4th Rd. - #4 Jankovic vs. #15 Wickmayer
...Pam Shriver will be courtside, and Wickmayer will search her out and say, "I'm amazed you played tennis because I can still hear you."
4th Rd. - #3 V.Williams vs. #19 Pennetta
...for the right for one final golden opportunity to seize a grand slam moment? On hard court, for Venus. To get on par with Francesca, for Flavia.



*PREVIEW NOTES*
...#1-seeded Wozniacki is the first woman to hold the top spot at the Open without having previously won a slam singles crown since Clijsters was in the same position at Flushing Meadows in 2003.

Also, C-Woz is the sixth different woman to hold the #1 seed at the Open in the last six years. Of course, there's little, if any, difference at the other three slams. Both Roland Garros and Wimbledon have had six different top-seeded women over the same span, while the Australian Open's streak is currently at five years.

...Li Na will attempt (or maybe try to avoid doing so) to extend her non-calendar "unGrand Slam" and turn it into a "True unGrand Slam" at this Open. She's now lost at four straight slams to the eventual singles champion: '09 US/Clijsters, '10 AO/S.Williams, '10 RG/Schiavone, and '10 WI/S.Williams.. Of note, she's in the "Quarter of Death" with Wozniacki, Sharapova and Kuznetsova this time around in NYC.

...Serena Williams isn't playing at this slam (no, this doesn't count as a "longing" reference), but as it begins she'll rank in the #1 spot on the WTA computer for the 117th week of her career. It ties her with also-absent-from-the-Open Henin (ditto), who has also held the top spot for 117 weeks in her career. Mid-way through the tournament, Williams will complete week #118. If Wozniacki wins the title, the Dane would knock Serena out of the top spot once the tournament ends.



...I'll be debuting three new Backspin slam awards for this Open. First, the woman who puts on the most (melo?)dramatic, headline-grabbing, mostly tennis-related (but not necessarily so) show will be determined to be "Broadway Bound." Just call it my version of a "Tennis Tony." And, no, this award isn't necessarily destined to go to you-know-who.... though she's the early favorite, of course. Second, I'll single out the "Best Night Match" for the women. Also, the woman who is deemed to be the most worthy starlet of the tournament's nighttime schedule on Ashe will be bestowed with the first "Lady of the Evening" award. Yes, I know that phrase usually connotates a line of work other than "tennis player," and I almost went with "Creature of the Night" instead for that very reason, but I decided to go with the original thought largely because of the wink-wink, double-meaning nature of the title. The "BB" honor will be specific to the U.S. Open, but I'll be giving the "LOTE" award for the Australian Open's after-hours star at Laver Arena come January, as well.

...I got a good laugh out of an article in Sunday's Washington Post detailing the hand-wringing within the sport about the post-Sisters years. Len DeLuca, ESPN's senior vice president of programming calls it a "challenge" to get fans interested in "players not named Williams." Jamie Reynolds, ESPN's vice president of event production, is quoted as saying that blending biographical details about lesser known players with lively, opinionated commentary is the key. "We dig deep to try to make those 'roster players' as interesting or provacative or entertaining as possible," Reynolds says, "and try to steer our audience into having a great appreciation for those up-and-coming players."

(pause)

Hahahahahahahaha. Seriously, what a pile of stinking horse manure that comment is. Since when has ESPN EVER done that? Half their announcing team constantly laments having "never heard of" every third player in the draw (even the ones who might have won a tournament within the week), or denigrate the presence of players who make surprise slam runs (WICK-mayer, anyone?). And when that's not happening, the networks serves up a steady diet of coverage that focuses on about five players or whatever no-chance-in-hell-to-win-a-match American who happens to be playing at the moment. If that fails, they'll usually show a replay of a match they already showed earlier in the day rather than focus on an "up-and-coming" player making a career run in a slam (remember the non-covered and barely-mentioned Kvitova-Kanepi thriller at Wimbledon that produced a first-time slam semifinalist?).

John McEnroe can be questioned on many things he says (and usually is, which I think he probably enjoys), but he's correct when he says this in the article: "We have to reach out to fans, make people aware of these players as human beings so there is a rooting interest. People have to feel something that they can relate to on some level. That's something we've lost over time."

Very true. Of course, ESPN could also just choose to show those players umm, what do you call it? Oh, yeah. Playing tennis. Over-produced Olympic coverage-styled bio pieces are nice, but nothing beats showing the actual athlete in athletic competition in order to attempt to spark "brand loyalty." Far too often ESPN fails to even follow through with such rudimentary televised sports actions as that.

You have to learn to walk before you can show how fast you can run, after all.





=ROUND OF 16 PREDICTIONS=
#1 Wozniacki d. #14 Sharapova
#11 Kuznetsova d. Chakvetadze
#4 Jankovic d. #15 Wickmayer
#7 Zvonareva d. #17 Petrova
#10 Azarenka d. #6 Schiavone
#19 Pennetta d. #3 V.Williams
#12 Dementieva d. Rodionova
#2 Clijsters d. #13 Bartoli


..."The Big (Apple) Bang" takes place, and I'll go with Wozniacki due in part to Sharapova's potential foot problem possibly limiting her movement (which isn't exactly the tour's best anyway) against a player who likes long rallies and opponent-running crosscourt groundstrokes. The Jankovic/Zvonareva/Wickmayer/Petrova section is really anyone's to take. I'll go with the higher-seeded players. Pennetta has a knack for beating Venus.

=QUARTERFINAL PREDICTIONS=
#1 Wozniacki d. #11 Kuznetsova
#7 Zvonareva d. #4 Jankovic
#10 Azarenka d. #19 Pennetta
#12 Dementieva d. #2 Clijsters


...the Wozniacki/Kuznetsova winner becomes the odds-on favorite. JJ's in a section she could win, but she's given no reason this summer to think she could (even picking her this far is probably a Hail Mary). Clijsters' slam results have been wanting in '10, so I'll take the first legit opportunity to dump her out of this draw just because I don't want to have to deal with her in the SF (where I'd probably have a hard time doing anything but predicting a successful defense if she'd reached that stage). Hey, I must be cruel, only to be kind.

=SEMIFINAL PREDICTIONS=
#1 Wozniacki d. #7 Zvonareva
#12 Dementieva d. #10 Azarenka


...That it should come to this! The past week was really an Open preview. Who knew? Wozniacki defeated Zvonareva in the Montreal final on Monday, then Dementieva in the New Haven semis on Friday.

=FINAL PREDICTION=
#1 Wozniacki d. #12 Dementieva

...good night, sweet Prince(ss). Come on, you didn't think I was going to use all those "Hamlet" quotes and NOT pick the Dane (the tennis-playing one, I mean) to win, did you? O, what a rogue and peasant slave am I.

C-Woz really hasn't yet gotten her game into what is its potential peak form at this stage in her career, but it might be good enough in this slam to grab a preview-of-the-future title. If she did it, she wouldn't be yet another woman stuck with having to defend rising to the #1 ranking without winning a slam, either.

Hmmm, I guess I SHOULD note here that "Hamlet" IS a tragedy, huh? Well, let's just say we forget about that little fact and run with the rest, all right?



...Rafael Nadal comes to New York with a chance to become the first man to win Roland Garros, Wimbledon and the U.S. Open in the same year since Rod Laver in 1969, but his form on the hard courts this summer didn't really spark a rhapsody of words. Roger Federer, though, has rounded into form rather nicely (though I wonder if he'd be able to go all the way if he's forced to endure multiple five-setters along the way).

The Federer/Nadal combo has gotten back on the horse, winning three straight slams since Juan Martin del Potro (has the absence of a defending slam champ ever occurred with less notice?) dethroned Federer in NYC a year ago. Twenty of the last twenty-two slams going back to Roland Garros '05 (and twenty-two of twenty-five back to Wimbledon '04) have been won by either the Spaniard or the Swiss, including eleven straight from 2005-07.

They might not win this one, but since I don't buy into the notion that Andy Murray is "destined" to one day win a slam, the odds are that one of them will.

=ROUND OF 16 PREDICTIONS=
#1 Nadal d. #23 Lopez
#31 Nalbandian d. #24 Gulbis
#4 Murray d. #20 Querrey
#7 Berdych d. #12 Youzhny
#9 Roddick d. #26 Bellucci
#3 Djokovic d. #19 Fish
#5 Soderling d. #11 Cilic
#2 Federer d. #13 Melzer


...if everything is sound, Federer's draw to the QF looks like a fairly routine trip (even with Hewitt in the 3rd Round). I wouldn't be shocked if Roddick was an early upset victim. Nadal's draw gets especially hairy after this round.

=QUARTERFINAL PREDICTIONS=
#31 Nalbandian d. #1 Nadal
#4 Murray d. #7 Berdych
#3 Djokovic d. #9 Roddick
#2 Federer d. #5 Soderling


...down goes Rafa. Unless he's been playing opossum, Nadal's resounding ending to a slam season of dominance looks it'll be nothing more than a quintessence of dust.

=SEMIFINAL PREDICTIONS=
#4 Murray d. #31 Nalbandian
#2 Federer d. #3 Djokovic


...and we end the slam season the same way it began..

=FINAL PREDICTION=
#2 Federer d. #4 Murray

...but the Scot won't shed a tear this time. Even if might want to.

So, the Swiss Mister has an "off" year and he still wins two slams. How Federeresque would that be?



*U.S. OPEN TOP SEEDS*
[women]
2000 Martina Hingis, SUI
2001 Martina Hingis, SUI
2002 Serena Williams, USA
2003 Kim Clijsters, BEL
2004 Justine Henin-Hardenne, BEL
2005 Maria Sharapova, RUS
2006 Amelie Mauresmo, FRA
2007 Justine Henin, BEL
2008 Ana Ivanovic, SRB
2009 Dinara Safina, RUS
2010 Caroline Wozniacki, DEN
[men]
2000 Andre Agassi, USA
2001 Gustavo Kuerten, BRA
2002 Lleyton Hewitt, AUS
2003 Andre Agassi, USA
2004 Roger Federer, SUI
2005 Roger Federer, SUI
2006 Roger Federer, SUI
2007 Roger Federer, SUI
2008 Rafael Nadal, ESP
2009 Roger Federer, SUI
2010 Rafael Nadal, ESP

*U.S. OPEN TITLES - OPEN ERA*
[women]
6...Chris Evert, USA
5...Steffi Graf, GER
4...Martina Navratilova, USA
3...Margaret Smith-Court, AUS
3...Billie Jean King, USA
3...Serena Williams, USA
2...Tracy Austin, USA
2...Kim Clijsters, BEL
2...Justine Henin, BEL
2...Monica Seles, YUG
2...Venus Williams, USA
[women]
5...Jimmy Connors, USA
5...Roger Federer, SUI
5...Pete Sampras, USA
4...John McEnroe, USA
3...Ivan Lendl, CZE
2...Andre Agassi, USA
2...Stefan Edberg, SWE
2...Patrick Rafter, AUS

*MOST U.S. OPEN NIGHT SESSION WINS*
[women]
23...Venus Williams
20...Serena Williams
16...Martina Navratilova (undefeated)
14...Chris Evert (undefeated)
-
ALSO: 12-M.Sharapova (undefeated)
[men]
28...Andre Agassi
24...Jimmy Connors
20...Pete Sampras (undefeated)
17...Andy Roddick
16...John McEnroe
-
ALSO: 13-R.Federer (undefeated)

*RECENT U.S. OPEN SEMIFINALISTS*
2004: Svetlana Kuznetsova (W), Elena Dementieva (RU), Jennifer Capriati, Lindsay Davenport
2005: Kim Clijsters (W), Mary Pierce (RU), Elena Dementieva, Maria Sharapova
2006: Maria Sharapova (W), Justine Henin-Hardenne (RU), Jelena Jankovic, Amelie Mauresmo
2007: Justine Henin (W), Svetlana Kuznetsova (RU), Anna Chakvetadze, Venus Williams
2008: Serena Williams (W), Jelena Jankovic (RU), Elena Dementieva, Dinara Safina
2009: Kim Clijsters (W), Caroline Wozniacki (RU), Yanina Wickmayer, Serena Williams

**LOW-SEEDED U.S. OPEN CHAMPIONS - OPEN ERA**
unseeded/wild card - Kim Clijsters, BEL (2010)
#9 - Svetlana Kuznetsova, RUS (2004)
#7 - Serena Williams, USA (1999)
#6 - Virginia Wade, GBR (1968)

*RECENT U.S. OPEN GIRLS FINALS*
2005 Victoria Azarenka/BLR def. Alexa Glatch/USA
2006 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova/RUS def. Tamira Paszek/AUT
2007 Kristina Kucova/SVK def. Urszula Radwanska/POL
2008 Coco Vandeweghe/USA def. Gabriela Paz/VEN
2009 Heather Watson/GBR def. Yana Buchina/RUS






All for now. Day 1 awaits.

(Oh, and thanks to "Willie S." for all his quotes, of course.)

Read more...

Saturday, August 28, 2010

Wk.34- Bare Bones Backspin: Wozniacki Open Edition

Can you hear that? It's the sound of the Open knocking on the front door. I don't want to keep he/she/it waiting too long. So, Backspin is bare-boned.

*WEEK 34 CHAMPIONS*

NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT (Premier $600K/hard outdoors)
S: Caroline Wozniacki def. Nadia Petrova 6-3/3-6/6-3
D: Peschke/Srebotnik d. Mattek-Sands/Shaughnessy



PLAYER OF THE WEEK: Caroline Wozniacki/DEN
...
once again, Caroline reigned supreme at the Wozniacki Open. Otherwise known as the Pilot Pen at New Haven. The Dane has played there three times, and is now 13-0 with three singles titles from 2008-10. After winning the Montreal final on Monday, C-Woz was fortunate to have a bye for the 1st Round of this tournament, then got a walkover against Flavia Pennetta in the QF when the Italian pulled out with an injured foot. So, "all" she needed was a victory over "lucky loser" Dominika Cibulkova, a three set victory in a thriller against Elena Dementieva in the SF and another three-setter against Nadia Petrova in the final to wrap up career crown #10 (and her tour-leading fourth in '10) while also claiming the U.S. Open Series for the first time. Now, she heads to New York seven rounds away from bumping Serena Williams out of the #1 spot on the WTA computer. Let the trek down the hard road begin.
=============================
RISER: Maria Kirilenko/RUS
...
after grabbing some doubles titles in recent weeks, the Russian reached her first singles SF of 2010 in New Haven with wins over Elena Vesnina ('09 RU), Timea Bacsinszky and Dinara Safina. Hopefully, the back injury that bothered her in the SF against Petrova won't hinder her at Flushing Meadows. She already has two Round of 16-or-better slam results (AO QF, RG 4th Rd.) this season.
=============================
SURPRISES: Julia Mayr & Evelyn Mayr, ITA
...
the sisters are facing off this weekend in the singles final of a $10K challenger in Portschauch, Austria. They'll also be teaming together in an attempt to win the doubles final.
=============================
COMEBACKS: Elena Dementieva/RUS & Dinara Safina/RUS
...
Dementieva's summer hasn't been a very pleasant experience, as she's had a difficult time getting back in the groove since losing at Roland Garros and ending her 46-slam consecutive appearance streak by pulling out of Wimbledon with a calf injury. In New Haven, she finally started to resemble herself again, notching a pair of three-hour match wins and advancing past Maria Jose Martinez-Sanchez, Kateryna Bondarenko and Marion Bartoli to reach the SF. She served for the match against Wozniacki in the SF, but ended up losing in a 3rd set tie-break. Meanwhile, Safina got another confidence boost heading into NYC, getting revenge on Montreal conqueror Francesca Schiavone in the New Haven 1st Round, then defeating Daniela Hantuchova en route to the QF, her best result since Week 17.
=============================
VETERANS: Nadia Petrova/RUS & Kveta Peschke/Katarina Srebotnik, CZE/SLO
...
Petrova had yet to reach a singles SF in '10 before this past week, but she found her game in time to reach the New Haven final after getting victories over Varvara Lepchenko (from 6-1/5-2 down), Bethanie Mattek-Sands, Samantha Stosur and Kirilenko. Nadia, at her best, normally peaks a week or two BEFORE a slam... could she be right on schedule for a surprising Open run this time around? Peschke/Srebotnik picked up the New Haven doubles crown, their second as a team in '10 and third overall title for each this year (Peschke won in Hobart w/ Chuang Chia-Jung, while Srebotnik claimed the RG Mixed title with Nenad Zimonjic).
=============================
FRESH FACE: Meilen Auroux/ARG
...
Argentina's Auroux, 22, won her third challenger title of the season with a win in the $10K Buenos Aires final over countrywoman Vanessa Furlanetto.
=============================
DOWN: Melanie Oudin/USA & Tennis Australia
...
Oudin heads into her attempt to defend QF points at the U.S. Open on a four match losing streak (three of them in 1st Round encounters) after losing to Lucky Loser Cibulkova in the opening round in New Haven. Meanwhile, one has to wonder how Tennis Australia decides how to use its discretionary slam wild cards. Rather than give its free Open main draw pass to Jelena Dokic, a slam quarterfinalist a year and a half ago, currently the fourth highest-ranked Australian on the WTA computer (#82) and the winner of fifteen straight matches over three challenger events this summer, it handed the golden ticket to Sophie Ferguson, the #117-ranked player with a total of two slam wins (2-7) in her career. As it turned out, #2-qualifying seed Dokic lost in the opening round of the Open qualies to a hard-serving and upset-minded Laura Robson. The three Aussies ranked ahead of (Stosur, Groth & Rodionova), and the one immediately behind (Molik), Dokic all were eligible in time to get an automatic berth into the Open MD. In retrospect, one can argue that it's difficult to say that Dokic should have gotten the MD spot since she couldn't win even one match in qualifying, but the truth is that she shouldn't have even had to face the prospect of extending her win streak to eighteen just to get into the main draw. Of course, this brand of wild card shenanigans is nothing new when it comes to the folks from Australia (remember Yanina Wickmayer this January in Oz, who DID make it through qualifying rounds that she SHOULD have been exempt from playing through?). Then, as it turns out, Ferguson's Open draw gives her a qualifier opponent in the 1st Round. Oh, if it only could have been Dokic. Naturally, this leads one to ask one thing: what did Dokic do to tick off T.A. THIS time? Right herself by getting coaching in Europe?
=============================
ITF PLAYER: Anna Chakvetadze/RUS
...
the Russian Doll, a U.S. Open semifinalist in '07, won the $100K challenger in the Bronx, defeating Sofia Arvidsson 4-6/6-2/6-2 in the final. Previous wins over Chang Yung-Jan, Lucie Safarova, Anastasiya Sevastova and Ekaterina Makarova helped pave the way toward Chakvetadze joining Kaia Kanepi as the only other player to win both WTA and ITF singles titles this season.
=============================
JUNIOR STAR: Christina Makarova/USA
...
the 14-year old American won the U.S. Junior International Hard Court Championship, defeating fellow Bannerette Ronit Yurovsky 5-7/6-3/6-0 in the final.
=============================


1. NH SF - Wozniacki d. Dementieva
...1-6/6-3/7-6(5).
Over the past few weeks, C-Woz has shown great resilience in tight situations, and this match was no different. Dementieva had a break point for 4-1 in the 3rd, and served for the match at 5-3. Wozniacki held three match points at 6-5 on Dementieva's serve, but Punch-Sober pulled out one of her at-her-best-when-she's-behind strings and ran off eight straight points, taking a 3-0 lead in the deciding tie-break. It wasn't enough. The Dane produced the last late-match surge, winning seven of the final nine points to take the TB 7-5 (and end with a 109-107 edge in total points for the match).
=============================
2. NH Final - Wozniacki d. Petrova
...6-3/3-6/6-3.
C-Woz, perhaps tiring a bit, wavered a touch in the 2nd set and was forced to go three again. She never showed a sign of stress, though, fairly casually getting an early break and never looking back. Now for one final walk around the Yale campus before heading off for Corona Park.
=============================
3. NH Q1 - Vesnina d. Ch.Gullickson 3-6/7-6/6-2
NH 1st - Kirilenko d. Vesnina 6-1/3-6/6-1
...
NCAA champ Chelsey Gullickson, who turns 20 on Sunday the 29th, gave New Haven's '09 runner-up (and #1 qualifying seed a year later) a nice battle in the opening Q-round. Vesnina would go out to eventual semifinalist Kirilenko in the 1st. All in all, not a bad match for Gullickson (who received a USTA wild card into the Open, where she'll make her slam MD debut) to end her preparation with heading into her first big-time professional match in the 1st Round of the Open against #1-seed Wozniacki. Hmmm, the #1-seed versus the NCAA champion, who just happens to be an American. Smells like a night match on Ashe to me... or at least it SHOULD be.
=============================
HM- NH 1st Rd - An.Rodionova d. Pironkova
...6-1/7-5.
Maybe playing in a slam again will get Tsvetana's head out of her... umm, let's just say her "racket bag". As the #32 seed, she faces Renata Voracova in the 1st Round. I'm not holding my breath.
=============================


**2010 WTA TITLES**
4...CAROLINE WOZNIACKI, DEN
3...Belgian Barbie, BEL
2...nine players

**2010 - CONSECUTIVE TITLES**
2...Venus Williams (February, Dubai/Acapulco)
2...Agnes Szavay (July, Budapest/Prague)
2...CAROLINE WOZNIACKI (AUGUST, MONTREAL/NEW HAVEN)

**CAREER WTA TITLES - ACTIVE**
[overall]
43...Venus Williams, USA
43...Justine Henin, BEL
38...Belgian Barbie, BEL
37...Serena Williams, USA
22...Maria Sharapova, RUS
16...Elena Dementieva, RUS
13...Svetlana Kuznetsova, RUS
12...Jelena Jankovic, SRB
12...Dinara Safina, RUS
11...Patty Schnyder, SUI
10...CAROLINE WOZNIACKI, DEN
10...Vera Zvonareva, RUS
[last three seasons]
10...CAROLINE WOZNIACKI [3/3/4]
9...Serena Williams [4/3/2]
8...Elena Dementieva [3/3/2]

**U.S. OPEN SERIES CHAMPIONS**
2004 Lindsay Davenport
2005 Belgian Barbie *
2006 Ana Ivanovic
2007 Maria Sharapova
2008 Dinara Safina
2009 Elena Dementieva
2010 CAROLINE WOZNIACKI
--
* - won U.S. Open


U.S. Open Preview next. All for now.

Read more...

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

BACKSPIN TIME CAPSULE: 2006 U.S. Open - More than "Exquisite in the City"



(twelfth in a series)

While the U.S. Open has drama built into its very foundation, the 2006 version gave us one of those tournaments at Flushing Meadows from which all sorts of memories were bound to be born.

For one, before the event had even started we knew that a pair of tennis legends -- Andre Agassi and Martina Navratilova -- had decided to call it quits for good once the Open had concluded. Beyond that, Justine Henin-Hardenne was trying to become the first woman in nine years to reach the finals of all four slams in a calendar year, while Amelie Mauresmo (who'd beaten the Belgian in two slam finals already in '06), was attempting to see if her newly-found nerves of steel would translate into her finally being able to be as graceful on the courts at Flushing Meadows as she'd been in Melbourne and London. Maria Sharapova, too, was seeking to prove that her title-winning run as a 17-year old at Wimbledon was nothing short of a preview of bigger and better things... but it'd been more than two years since she'd played in a grand slam final. Then we had the not-as-chaotic-as-she-would-eventually-become coming out party of one Miss Jelena Jankovic. She'd go on to achieve many goals following her '06 Open run, but the first wacky seeds she planted in NYC that summer still blossom in our collective mind's eye today.

Oh, and then there are those four words that conger all the images of style and sport that eventually came to symbolize the event: the little black dress.

The '06 Open was more than just "Exquisite in the City," and the stems of many of the flowering storylines that originated during those two weeks still spark thrilling memories today. It's only been four years, but it SEEMS so many more ago. Maybe it's just our minds playing tricks with us.

Anyway, in a bit of a change-up from the usual Time Capsule format, here's a look back at the '06 Open as I saw it then, not quite day-by-day... but as close to it as reasonably possible:



...thanks to a rainy opening to the week, the '06 Open got off to a slow start. Maria Sharapova's scheduled Day 2 debut was delayed for twenty-four hours. It only served to heighten the anticipation of her tournament "unveiling" under the lights on Ashe. Better yet, once she arrived she did anything but disappoint.

Day 3 - "The Little Black Dress"

If they awarded grand slam titles after one match, then Maria Sharapova would have her first U.S. Open championship all but wrapped up.

It should really come as no surprise. After all, she was nothing if not dressed for success on Wednesday night.



Her classic little black dress was as elegant as Serena's infamous catsuit was... um... let's just say "interesting." But Sharapova didn't destroy Michaella Krajicek 6-3/6-0 in what was supposed to be a tough match because the Dutch teenager was mesmerized by Maria's fashion sense. The Supernova's game was simply as stylish as her ensemble. There was no Mashona Washington-inspired scare that required the on-court arrival of some pesky pigeons for her to escape with a victory this time around.

On Day 3, it was the rest of the field that might have reason to worry. The Lady in Black has arrived in New York, and she doesn't look as if she wants to go home empty-handed.


***

...Vania King will indeed have a nighttime presence on Arthur Ashe Stadium tomorrow, but it won't be for her 2nd Round match against Justine Henin-Hardenne. That'll take place during the day. At night, she'll be singing the national anthem before the night session. Way to go, Vania.



...Sharapova had to make a quick turnaround on Day 4, getting things back on schedule by playing for a second straight day. Poor Emilie Loit. She could have used another day to prepare.

Meanwhile, Daniela Hantuchova once again displayed the sort of form that -- unlike Sharapova's -- fell far short of what everyone had expected from her on the big stages of the tennis world when she initially broke through and quickly climbed into the Top 5.

Day 4 - "La Belle Dame Sans Merci & the Grand Deception"

Quick! Someone find a strainer to catch at least a little of what's left of Daniela Hantuchova before she goes down the drain!

Whoops... looks like it might be too late.

On Day 4, while Wonder Girl continued her "one step forward, two steps back" headlong plunge toward oblivion, the Supernova was still running on the leftover adrenaline from Day 3's outing in the little black dress.

Maria Sharapova's skin apparently retained some remnants of the little black dress' magic, or at least that's the idea that Emilie Loit had to be clinging to as she fell behind 6-0/4-0 against the #3 seed in their 2nd Round match. The afterglow did eventually go away, but it didn't stop Sharapova from advancing while surrending just one game in the match. So far at this Open, it's fair to say that the Supernova has assumed the role of La Belle Dame Sans Merci -- the beautiful lady without mercy.

(All right, I admit it. I've had that one setting around for quite a while, waiting for an appropriate moment to use it... and this seemed as good a time as ever, don't you think?)

It certainly appears that Hantuchova will never be able to claim such a title. In her 2nd Round match against Serena Williams, all the old bugaboos came back to haunt her once again. Serving up 5-3 in the 1st set, her game simply became unhinged. Bad drop shots. Double faults. Soon she'd lost the set 5-7, and was down 0-3 in the 2nd. With the match all but over, she finally rejoined the rest of us in 2006... not that it mattered. She still lost 5-7/3-6.

Four years ago, when Hantuchova claimed her first singles title in Indian Wells, the tennis world saw fit to build her an impromptu throne. She was dubbed the next great marketing doll/tool for the tour, and one with a game to back up all the attention. I, for one, never really bought into the hype, hence the dripping-with-sarcasm birth of her "Wonder Girl" moniker (originally, it was meant to be said with an accompanying eye roll... though it's now used without such disdain), but I was open to being wrong about her.

I wasn't, though. The "legend" of Hantuchova DID turn out to be THE grand deception of the 21st century so far (well, at least the biggest one that doesn't involve the Bush administration). The Tour's post-Kournikova dream scenario never happened (well, at least not for Hantuchova... it DID become a reality with Sharapova, and could again with Nicole Vaidisova).

Hantuchova reached the Top 5, then crashed physically and emotionally. She's never been able to come close to reclaiming her former position, nor even win another title. Rather than being a prelude to a great career, Indian Wells '02 has turned out to be a teasing aberration. Collapses like the one against Williams today are just another sign that things are still a very long way from turning around... if they EVER will.

Maybe Hantuchova should be given some credit for trying, though. Some can't handle the long climb back (Jelena Dokic, at #4 when Hantuchova was #5, has chosen to alternately swim upstream or just flat out disappear). But, then again, there are few sights in sports that are more discouraging than watching what was thought to be the career of a grand talent turn out to be something so far less than expected that the athlete becomes something of a figure of sadness even though their performances would be lauded were they someone who'd been burdened with far less expectation when they were young.

Who knows, maybe Hantuchova will one day rise from the ashes ala Jennifer Capriati... but it's difficult to envision such a resurrection when Wonder Girl has days like she had today.


***

..."Attention wise, fashion foolish?"... Bethanie Mattek, the same player who brought us the 1970's boardwalk rollerskater & soccer enthusiast look at Wimbledon, gave the world another loopy look the other day:



Who knew living room drapes could double as sporting attire? And, yes, those look like leg warmers (naturally). Well, at least she got her picture distributed all over the net again. "Good" for her... right? Yeah, maybe not.




...the '06 Open began with the knowledge that it would be Andre Agassi's final go-around in his Hall of Fame career, as the 36-year old American had announced beforehand that he would retire following the event. No one knew what to expect from him (or his ailing back), as he'd managed to make an unexpected run to the final at Flushing Meadows one year earlier. Surely everyone wished for a Connorsican run deep into the tournament's second week, but in their collective heart of hearts they knew it wasn't a likely scenario. That being the case, one final classic Agassi match under the lights of Ashe would be worth its weight in gold (and lasting tennis memories). As it turned out, Cyprus showman Marcos Baghdatis helped Andre oblige the masses.

Alas, it would be Agassi's final victory as a professional, as his storied career would end one round later. But it was something to hold onto forever.

Day 4.5 - "Late Night with Andre"

Andre Agassi is squeezing every last drop of emotion and drama out of the final Act of his career playing out at the U.S. Open.

Thursday night at Arthur Ashe Stadium, for a while, looked as if it was going to include a surprisingly routine win for the 36-year old American over #8-seeded Marcos Baghdatis, fifteen years his junior and runner-up at the Australian Open this year before his semifinal run at Wimbledon earlier this summer. The Cypriot was curiously off his game and perhaps distracted by the atmosphere that made the homemade signs that read "Andre's House" seem perfectly appropriate.

Agassi won the first two sets 6-4/6-4 and was on his way to an under-two hour victory. Baghdatis seemed to sense that the crowd wanted Agassi to survive to fight another day more than it desired a great, epic match, and he seemed willing to oblige as he watched "the wave" travel round the stadium with a grin on his face. He seemed to want no part in playing the villain in Agassi's Superman play. Boy, was that assumption wrong. As it turned out, Baghdatis turned the big afterschool party into another unforgettable episode of "Late Night with Andre."

Move over, David Letterman.

Baghdatis is one of the most exciting and excitable players on tour, and he proved it once again on perhaps the sport's biggest stage in this 2nd Round match. As he began to pump himself up with brilliant shotmaking and pounded his chest as he showed the heart that makes him so fun to watch, he claimed the 3rd set 6-3 and roared back from a 0-4 deficit in the 4th to knot the match with a 7-5 win.

Then things really got weird... in a matter of minutes, we were only an episode of projectile vomiting away from seeing a Stephen King novella play out before our eyes. (Well, that or one of those old Pete Sampras matches where he's tossing his lunch in the corner of the court in between hitting blistering forehands down the line.)



As the 5th set turned into a game-by-game fight for the continuation of Agassi's career, at 4-4 Deuce on Agassi's serve Baghdatis was suddenly struck with leg cramps that alternately sent him crumpled into a heap on the court, bent over in the corner, hopping around like a mad kangaroo, or hobbling from side to side like a stoop-backed great-grandfather.

Suddenly, we had something different altogether.

But rather than fold, Baghdatis began going for outright Sampras-like winners early in points, while Agassi became tentative and/or perplexed about how to play a hampered opponent backed into a corner and throwing out any and every weapon at his disposal simply to keep from shriveling up into a raisin in front of 20,000-plus spectators. Eight deuces later, Agassi finally won the game.

Whew!

The match had turned into a classic before everyone's eyes, with Agassi's career (and tired back?) teetering in the balance, and everyone wondering whether that 20-minute cortisone shot would last as the match time ticked past 3:30 and 12:30am (again) quickly approached.

In the end, when Baghdatis' final shot sailed past the baseline and a relieved Agassi approached the net, everyone in the stands was allowed to breath again. The legend was still alive and kicking (even if he won't be able to stand up in the morning).

With Baghdatis outlasted and unable to play the role of "villain" (ironically, he probably became a "hero" himself in the process), Andre's New York show now brings us a final Agassi-Becker clash. No, it's not that Becker, but it doesn't matter. Maybe it'll be Andy Roddick who ultimately dons the black hat in the Round of 16, but who's to say how this story will end at this point?

No one wants this ride to end... and maybe it won't. At this point, this bald guy doesn't seem to be able to do anything wrong. Maybe he never will in this final, potentially magical journey.

Ah, just another "average" night in New York, huh? Eat your heart out Mr. Letterman... Andre owns the late night now. At least for a little while longer.

(Boy, now we're REALLY going to miss him when he's gone.)




...less than four years before her stunning grand slam title win in Paris, Francesca Schiavone was still a player who'd yet to win a single TOUR TITLE in her career. At age 26, the Italian vet played out a match storyline against Shahar Peer that was far too common at this point in her career. As surprising as her Roland Garros run this past spring was at the time, the knowledge of it would have have been akin to being flattened by a feather had we been able to gaze into the future and witness it after what happened to her on Day 5 at the Open in 2006.

On the other hand, another player who didn't rise to the occasion on this day four years ago -- Nicole Vaidisova -- was judged to simply have been delivered a "learning experience" by a certain not-yet-as-chaotic-as-she'd-soon-be Serb. As it turned out, the Czech's loss was but a power point in the beginning of what would be a career that would soon meet a premature end. After notching four QF-or-better slam results in 2007-08 (including an Oz SF in '07), her tennis career (or at least her FIRST one) ended earlier this season when she retired at age 20 after a prolonged slump/period of indifference and married ATP player Radek Stepanek.

Day 5 - "Jana Would Be Proud"

Try as they might to get fully back on schedule before the weekend, the tournament organizers of the U.S. Open were again denied their goal by good ol' Mother Nature.

But Shahar Peer managed to make the most of her time during Day 5. Francesca Schiavone? Ummmm... not quite so much.

LOVE-LOVE... this is hardly the type of news you want to be making at a grand slam, Ms. Schiavone. You know you've had a nightmare of a day when being reminded that Jana Novotna DID lose to Chanda Rubin after leading 5-0, 40-0 in the 3rd set at Roland Garros in 1995 is the only way to avoid believing that no one has EVER choked away a match as badly as you just did. Of course, not that Schiavone will ever forget (or maybe live down) fumbling away a 5-1 3rd set lead over Peer in which she blew five match points as the Israeli teen won 6-3/6-7/7-6. In the end, Novotna won 24 singles titles, including one grand slam in her Hall of Fame career. Schiavone is still stuck on zero career wins, and why the title-less Italian is still as such at age 26 has rarely been as crystal clear as it is right about now.

=============================
LOVE-15... if not for Schiavone's dive off the face of a steep cliff, the biggest news of the day would be the three-set win by Jelena Jankovic over Nicole Vaidisova, who'll now have to wait until '07 for that elusive first grand slam final. Chalk it up as another learning experience. With the 5-7/6-3/6-2 win, though, Jankovic has proven to still have the finishing touch she discovered last month in L.A. after having it usually turn up M.I.A. throughout her career. With Vaidisova out of the way, Jankovic has the chance to seize a huge opportunity against Svetlana Kuznetsova in the Round of 16.
=============================
LOVE-30... let's just stick that Schiavone loss in an envelope and mail it to ourselves. There are two months or so left in this season, but when we open that letter in November who wants to bet that it'll still be the worst choke of the 2006 season?
=============================
LOVE-40... meanwhile, Justine had the hiccups on Day 5. For one set. After losing the opening stanza 6-4 to Ai Sugiyama, she proceeded to crush the Japanese vet (I won't say "Godzilla vs. Tokyo style"... why, that would be tacky) 6-1/6-0 in the final two sets.
=============================
GAME, "MAYBE ALESSIO & JELENA KOSTANIC SHOULD MEET FOR DINNER"... after Di Mauro was wiped out Godzilla vs. Tokyo style (here's a BETTER spot) by Andy Murray on Thursday, losing by a 6-0/6-1/6-1 score. It wasn't the double-bagel that Kostanic suffered against Lindsay Davenport the other day, but I'm sure the two would still have something in common to talk about.
=============================




...after being a player who was extremely difficult to get a bead on throughout her career, Jelena Jankovic was finally beginning to come into her own in 2006. Earlier that year, she nearly retired (or so she has said) after going through a 1-10 slump. But by the time the tour hit the North American hardcourts during the summer, she'd found her groove... and her sense of drama. As she advanced into her first career slam semifinal at Flushing Meadows, JJ wasn't yet the Queen Chaos symbol of all that is eyeroll-worthy that is so beloved on the Backspin landscape today. But she WAS starting to breakout as a truly unique character.

She, and we, have been all the better for it, too.

Day 9 - "The One and Only"

Jelena Jankovic used to be referred to around here as "the other Jelena." No longer. Now, she's looking like the one and only.

It's been a strange trip from there to here for Jankovic.

Once Jelena Dokic was no longer listed as "Serbian," though that label was always an iffy proposition at best depending on her constantly changing familial state of mind, Jankovic got a leg up on coming into her own. Once Dokic continued to fade from the tennis landscape in '06, possibly never to return from her trip through the looking glass, Jankovic stood alone.

But a coaching change and that 1-10 start wrecked the beginning of her season's story. She had horrible timing, it seemed. But as things have played out as the season has worn on, Jankovic's timing has turned out to be quite exquisite.

In Los Angeles last month, she displayed a breezy attitude and a killer game as she upset eventual U.S. Open Series champion Ana Ivanovic and Serena Williams, only to lose to Elena Dementieva in a three-set final. Today in New York, after showing she had developed quite a finishing touch against Nicole Vaidisova and Svetlana Kuznetsova, she finally finished what she started in southern California.

In the only major singles match that was able to be completed on Tuesday, Jankovic wiped out Dementieva 6-2/6-1 (Punch Sober never once held her serve!) to reach her first grand slam semifinal (not to mention earn a little rest while the remaining players will have to scramble to make up for another virtual rain-out at Flushing Meadows).

Thus, the one and only Jelena was the one and only player in the spotlight on Day 9. Talk about perfect timing.




...the string of bad luck that began to strike Tatiana Golovin's soon-to-be star-crossed career during the course of the '06 season was still fresh during the Open. Thankfully, though, so was Golovin at that point. After having been injured while playing Sharapova in Miami earlier in the season, on Day 10 at Flushing Meadows, she gave Sharapova a battle in the quarterfinals.

Unfortunately, injuries forced "The Frussian Pastry" (oh, that's a nickname I REALLY miss) off the tour in early '08, and she's never returned.

Meanwhile, while Agassi's career had concluded during the Open's first week, Martina Navratilova's continued. Preparing to walk away from the sport, one month shy of age 50, for the final time after concluding play at Flushing Meadows, she keep hope alive deep into the second week for a final title to put a finish touch on her incredible career.

Day 10 - "You Do the Voodoo That You Do So Well"

Maybe Tatiana Golovin should just try to avoid Maria Sharapova at all costs, since every time she gets on a roll she soon finds herself staring across the net at the Supernova... and the wheels fall off her smooth ride.

Playing the best tennis of her life in Miami early this year, she backed Sharapova into a corner in their SF match... then bent her ankle in a direction it just wasn't meant to go. On Wednesday night, experiencing the best slam of her career, Golovin's QF meeting with the Supernova had a taste of the same oddly dramatic sense of theater.

Down 0-3 in the 1st set tie-breaker, Golovin split open a blister on her foot and called for a trainer. As Sharapova waited and tried not to have her game go cold, she jumped around and practiced serving... while anyone who remembered Miami recalled how Sharapova took several bathroom breaks during the match that weren't exactly met with a warm reaction from the pro-Golovin crowd (the Frussian Pastry lives in Miami), and that the Supernova was ridiculously criticized after the match for never looking at the fallen Golovin and not showing enough concern for her (she stood near the wall, practicing her swing), despite the fact that she had no way of knowing the full extent of her opponent's injury at that particular moment in time, as Golovin even tried to play on.

This time, Sharapova couldn't help but look at Golovin as she ran across in front of her to her chair next to the umpire... but the uneasiness of the situation was readily apparent.

In the end, Golovin didn't have to retire this time around. She was just forced to witness Sharapova's ability to play the big points oh so well in her 7-6/7-6 victory. The win puts the Russian teen into her sixth semifinal in her last eight slams.

So far, though, Sharapova's 0-5 in those SF matches... and will now face Amelie Mauresmo, who's rather stealthily rounded her game into shape in New York, a player the Supernova (0-3 so far) has never beaten.

Whatever voodoo hex Sharapova has had placed on Golovin, she'd better find the witch doctor who did it fast. It looks like she's going to need something more than a little black dress to finally break through her slam SF glass ceiling.

Can you say, Amelie vs. Justine... again?


***

...Andre is gone, but Martina lives. At least for one more day. Navratilova has advanced to the quarterfinals in both Doubles (with Nadia Petrova) and Mixed (with Bob Bryan), and is scheduled to play both matches on Day 11. Navratilova/Petrova faces #1-seeded Raymond/Stubbs, while Navratilova/Byran will square off against Groenefeld/Cermak. It could be another great day for Martina, or the end of an era. Backspin is crossing fingers and toes for at least a few more days of the Greatest Player Who Ever Lived.

...it's never good to be scrawny, tired and unprepared if you're a professional tennis player. Andy Murray says he's not a morning person, but maybe he needs to start eating his Wheaties on the morning of a big match in the a.m., huh? At the net, Nikolay Davydenko looked almost sorry for Murray after he bageled him in the lightning-quick, blink-and-you'll-miss-it final set of their Round of 16 match. Victory over Roger Federer or not, Brad Gilbert has his work cut out for him with Murray. Thankfully, the clay is pretty good. Now it just needs to be molded into a reasonable facsimile of a grand slam contender.




...as the women's final four was set, the possibilities for the final match-up seemed endless, and full of storylines to sink our teeth into.

Day 11 - "Pick Your Poison"

The moment of truth has arrived, as the final four women remaining in the final grand slam of the season must now sort out their differences.

In a rather slow day of play dominated by doubles and junior action, about the only thing to debate other than whether or not Martina Navratilova should retire is which matchup in the women's final would be better:

Henin-Hardenne vs. Sharapova... this has been the popular pick from Day 1, with these two the most experienced/healthy/in form pair heading into the Open. For the most part, things haven't changed. JHH is going for a fourth slam final in '06, while Sharapova hasn't gotten past the SF in a slam since winning Wimbledon two years ago. But the "secret weapon" with this match is that one of the Open's biggest stars -- the little black dress -- would get a final turn around the dance floor.

Mauresmo vs. Henin-Hardenne... will the '06 slam trilogy become a reality? Could Mauresmo REALLY be going for THREE slams in a single year, and could JHH REALLY lose three slam finals to the same person in less than eight months? As sexy as a JHH/Supernova match-up would appear to be, this one has so many more juicy subplots. Melbourne has been the axis on which both players' seasons have turned, for both good and bad, and what more fitting way for the slam season to end could be found than for the year's top two players/adversaries to meet in a battle for what'll likely be the #1 ranking and "Player of the Year" honors? After the season she's had, this is all icing on the cake for Mauresmo. JHH, though, still may think she has something to prove to all the critics who hounded her for her Australian Open final retirement... and what she couldn't do at SW19 against Mauresmo she might have a better shot at doing at Flushing Meadows.

Jelena Jankovic vs. anyone... nothing against Jelena, but her story just has to end here, doesn't it? Otherwise, she'd be one of the most improbable slam finalists in recent memory. We're talking Iva Majoli territory here. Of course, Majoli beat Hingis in that Roland Garros final in '97, didn't she? Hmmm, maybe she WOULD be an interesting finalist... but she'd HAVE to WIN the whole shooting match to make it worthwhile. What are the chances of that?

So, pick your poison. Either way, center stage will be waiting for two women on Arthur Ashe come Saturday night. Now it's just a matter of who'll walk out from backstage when the curtain opens.


***

...Martina Navartilova may have lost her Doubles match during the day, but she and Bob Bryan advanced to the Mixed SF with a nighttime win over Groenefeld/Cermak. They'll next face Shaughnessy/Gimelstob, and Martina is already muttering about getting back at the male half of the American pair for hitting her with a shot a few months ago at Wimbledon. Ahh, we're gonna miss her.



...Sharapova's '06 Open train began to pick up speed as the final neared, as she derailed '06 Australian Open and Wimbledon champion Amelie Mauresmo's bid for a trio of slam titles by bageling her in two of three sets in their semifinal meeting. Awaiting her in the final would be Henin-Hardenne... but not until she teetered on the edge of defeat at the hands of Jankovic.

JJ's collapse after being five points away from an improbable final run was the beginning of the "Queen Chaos Era" (although the moniker wouldn't come until later). She'd eventually reach the Open final two years later AND become the #1 player in the world, cobbling together a nice (and maybe not yet complete) legacy from the ashes of a career that nearly voluntarily ended before she even played this Day 12 match against the Belgian. Again, or so JJ says... for as we first began to glean so well in this match, she's more prone to dramatic over and understatements than any other tennis player on the horizon.

Ah, bless her heart.

Day 12 - "Shock and Awesome"

On Day 12 of the 2006 U.S. Open, Justine Henin-Hardenne and Maria Sharapova reminded everyone precisely how they originally introduced themselves on the grand slam stage just a few seasons ago.

Through a series of shock and awe moments on Friday, they forcibly pushed and shoved their way past their shell-shocked opponents into the Saturday night meeting that had always appeared to be the most likely final weekend match-up when this tournament began nearly two weeks ago.

Back in 2003, "Le Petit Taureau" was born in a season that saw Henin-Hardenne fight through debilitating leg cramps to defeat Lindsay Davenport in a 9-7 3rd set in an Australian Open 4th Round contest, win her first slam crown in Roland Garros, then come to New York and survive back-to-back SF & Final matches against Jennifer Capriati (a three-hour contest where she was two points from defeat ten times, trailing 3-5 in the 2nd set and 2-5 in the 3rd) and, less than twenty-four hours later, Kim Clijsters despite being on the cusp (and teetering on the edge) of exhaustion.

A year later, a 17-year old Sharapova transformed herself from a player with great potential into a giant killer in front of everyone's eyes at Wimbledon. After a come-from-behind win over Davenport in the SF, she went "Supernova" as she shocked Serena Williams in the final, leaving the sportsworld in awe, and Madison Avenue banging down her door.

On Friday, Justine once again did what she did best... hold on against all odds and live to tell about it. Longshot semifinalist Jelena Jankovic was looking like anything but that in today's match. With Henin-Hardenne battling her own serve and the Serbian 21-year old hitting clean winners from all over the court, JHH fell behind 1-4 in the 1st set, ultimately losing it 6-4 after holding her serve just once in five attempts.

Later in the day, Maria blasted through world #1 Amelie Mauresmo, bageling the winner of two '06 grand slams in the 1st set. In a nip-and-tuck 2nd set, the Frenchwoman provided more evidence of her new-found resilience as she claimed the set 6-4 to force a deciding third stanza. If Sharapova was going to break her 0-for-5 slam SF streak, and reverse her 0-for-3 career mark against Mauresmo, she was going to have to reach back for the awe of '04.

Even while being able to break back to prevent a landslide loss, Henin-Hardenne still couldn't make up ground during the 2nd set of a match that saw her having tossed in eleven double-faults in a little more than a set and a half after having had just ten through the tournament's first five rounds. With Jankovic serving, JHH was down 4-6/2-4 30/40, and her shot to play in a fourth '06 slam final (something no woman had done since Martina Hingis in 1997) was about to disintigrate.

But then it happened.



Jankovic crazily got into an argument with the chair umpire for not being willing to overturn poor line calls (forcing her to use her replay challenges). Jankovic had had JHH cornered, but her own distraction gave "Le Petit Taureau" an opening... and it was all the Belgian needed to survive, and then thrive. After the argument, the Serbian immediately double-faulted on game point. Moments later, she'd been broken and her advantage erased.

Jankovic wouldn't win another game in the match.

With the crowd anticipating a heated 3rd set battle between Sharapova and Mauresmo, the shock that Sharapova created in the 1st set returned in full. After Amelie's leaping fist punch to celebrate her knotting of the match, she wouldn't win another game. The final set went just as the 1st as she was bageled by the 19-year old Russian once again in the 6-0/4-6/6-0 match.

Henin-Hardenne took the final ten games of HER match, finding her form just in time and winning 4-6/6-4/6-0... leaving Jankovic as disappointed in herself as JHH had to be proud of her own ability to persevere as she had back in 2003. Thus, on Day 12, the astounding lack of appreciation for "Le Petit Taureau's" laudable fighter's instincts that was displayed by the pouncing critics after Melbourne was once again called out to be the odious (not to mention forgetful) attack it was. Not to say "I told you so," but... I told you so.

Meanwhile, Sharapova's first slam final since claiming a Wimbledon title at least a year ahead of optimistic prognostications should have a quieting effect on any of the critics who'd begun to mutter under their breaths about her not living up to the expectations generated by her SW19 exploits. She's still improving... so imagine where she'll be a year from now.

Questions asked have now been countered with emphatic answers by both Henin-Hardenne and Sharapova. Now, there's only one more left: Who's going to win on Saturday night?

Whichever one it turns out to be, it'll be a moment worth savoring by the winner's backers, and a poke in the eye to their detractors.

Shock and awe THAT, boys and girls. No, make that "shock and awesome."


***

... Martina Navratilova, if she indeed does ultimately never play again, has a chance to go out in style. Today, she and Bob Bryan advanced to the Mixed Doubles final with a walkover past Meghann Shaughnessy/Justin Gimelstob (hmmm... I'm smellin' that conspiracy again). Tomorrow, she'll close out her career with a shot at a final grand slam title (it'd be her 59th) if she and Bryan can defeat Kveta Peschke & Martin Damm. The appropriate stage is set, and the match will actually take place AFTER the Henin-Hardenne/Sharapova singles final on Ashe. Another like her will never venture this way (and for this long) again, so it's time to enjoy her one last time. Hopefully, Peschke/Damm won't see fit to play the Benjamin Becker role and spoil the party.

... not sure what it means, but do you realize that in Amelie Mauresmo's final five sets of play in Flushing Meadows against Serena Williams and Maria Sharapova -- which surrounded the QF win over Dinara Safina -- she produced two brilliantly played sets of tennis but three (THREE!) sets lost at love. Weird. In the 3rd set against Sharapova, her accuracy just disappeared. There was some wind going through the court, but it really wasn't strong enough to account for her winning just seven of the final thirty-one points and committing fourteen unforced errors. It wasn't a return of the "old Amelie," but it wasn't the "new" one, either.




...Henin-Hardenne in her fourth slam final of '06. Sharapova in her first since winning Wimbledon in '04. The possibility of the match-up seemed reasonable at the start of the tournament, and the final pairing that resulted was hardly one that anyone could argue with. But on this grand stage, only one woman could be the star.

As it turned out, Sharapova was dressed perfectly for the occasion... just as she'd been when she'd made her '06 Open debut under the lights on Day 3.

Women's Final - "Exquisite in the City"

What will the 2006 U.S. Open be most remembered for? Andre Agassi's farewell, Martina Navratilova's one final audacious spit in the eye of time, Roger Federer's continuation of his dominance over a resurgent Andy Roddick... or Maria Sharapova's exquisite night on the town?

If her career holds true to form, bet on the Supernova. For she continues to stay one step ahead of the expectation game.



The reason Sharapova has so far managed to continue to defy the high expectations that her Wimbledon title and marketing plan have generated is because she always manages to jump on top of them early. From the moment she shed her wrap to reveal the little black dress on Day 3, one could sense that something special could be in the making in New York... then she spent two weeks doing nothing to dissuade the possibility, culminating in her caving in the roof on Justine Henin-Hardenne in a 6-4/6-4 win in the final to claim her first U.S. Open title.

Sharapova's final match at Flushing Meadows highlighted her old power strokes and big-point prowess, but also provided tantalizing hints of what could be to come. The Open put the advancement of Sharapova's game on full display. Better movement. Good preparation and a semblance of a gameplan. A willingness to move toward the net and force the action (something that should come in handy at SW19), even if it meant beating a five-time slam champ at her own game. Again, the scenarios abound after something like this.

Swinging defiantly. Grunting with abandon. Clenching a fist in triumph. And, just as importantly, doing it with exquisite style. A supernovic star in full luminosity.

In many ways, Sharapova is a symbol of all that makes New York -- which she says is her favorite city -- "New York." She has the style and grace to inspire notions of romance and grandeur, but enough heart and in-your-face confidence in herself and her abilities to never waver from her intended course. Some flash for the paparazzi, but enough substance to satisfy the rest of us.

Talk about a marriage made in sports heaven.

The Supernova has fashioned quite a story over the past two years, but could this maiden U.S. Open title signal the beginning of something even bigger? The "Sharapova Scenario" envisioned a moment like this but, true to form, the 19-year old may have made it happen about a year ahead of schedule.

Was this Open simply a titillating prelude, or has Sharapova's brief 12-18 month run of brilliance already begun? Needless to say, that will be the question du jour in these parts come Melbourne in January.

Her thirteenth career title will surely go down in tennis history as anything but unlucky, but is Sharapova in danger of attaining perfection?

Uh... naaah.

Forget for a moment about all the forehand and service winners that magically rocketed from her racket on Saturday, and remember that after the match Sharapova said that she had wanted to "do the opposite" and reverse her previous four-match losing streaking against Henin-Hardenne by completing a "360-degree flip" of all her previous actions in those matches. Of course, she meant to say "180-degrees," since a 360-flip would have brought her right back to where she started and this Backspin would have been lauding JHH's sixth grand slam title rather than Sharapova's second. Then, after her directional faux pas, Sharapova proceeded to knock the lid off the champion's cup when she held it up in girlish celebration.

(Hmmm, after the thing with the cell phone in '04, it looks like Maria needs to schedule some additional practice time to help her become more adept at working with props, doesn't it?)

Oh, well. Hey, the girl's not perfect. But she has time to work on that.


***

... sure, Roger Federer's four-set win over Andy Roddick in the men's final went off without a hitch (especially in the first and last sets, where he put on two more of those grand slam final clinics that are almost scary, what with the precise accuracy of his surgical dissection of a world-class opponent), but did Roddick's two-week Connors-inspired Open journey provide enough evidence to think that the men's game could become something other than a Federer/Nadal two-man play? Well, yeah. Maybe. If this U.S. Open Series was Roddick just scratching the surface of what he's capable of, then 2007 could very well see a THREE-headed monster terrorizing the ATP tour. Of course, that possibility does nothing to change the fact that Federer and Nadal have combined to win the last seven grand slam titles (could the Navratilova/Evert 15-slam hegemony from 1981-85 be in danger of being challenged?) and that Federer's ninth slam title means he's just became the first man to concurrently win three straight Wimbledon and three straight U.S. Open championships.

Yeah, Roddick has his work more than cut out for him.



...fittingly, Martina Navratilova's career apparently went off into the proverbial sunset (actually, the sun went down quite a few hours earlier in the day) with -- what else? -- another doubles title to add to her ridiculously long resume. A month shy of her 50th birthday, Navratilova and Bob Bryan handled Kveta Peschke/Martin Damm (both from Martina's native Czech Republic, to make things all the more apt) 6-2/6-3 in the Mixed Doubles Final that occurred after the Women's Singles festivities had wrapped up on Saturday.

But is her monstrously remarkable career REALLY over? This was her 59th career slam title, just three shy of Margaret Court's record. Hmmm... sounds like something to shoot for (not to mention the temptation of finally besting Billie Jean King with one more Wimbledon crown), doesn't it?

Said Martina, after the late night finish of the Mixed Final, "This is the last match. This is definite. Not allegedly. This is a closed chapter. It's past midnight. It's past my bed time."

Always leave 'em wanting more, I guess... even thirty-three years after it all began.

... in the other Doubles finals, unseeded Nathalie Dechy & Vera Zvonareva defeated #8-seeds Dinara Safina & Katarina Srebotnik. It was Dechy's first slam title, and Zvonareva's third ('04 US & '06 Wimbledon Mixed).

In Men's Doubles, #6 Martin Damm/Leander Paes upset #2 Jonas Bjorkman/Max Mirnyi to claim Damm's first career slam trophy and Paes' ninth.

...Hordette Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova (remember the name, as if you could ever forget it -- it's spelling it correctly that's the tough part) won her second Girls slam title of the year, adding the U.S. Open crown to her Australian Open title (she was also RU in Roland Garros) when she rallied to defeat Tamira Paszek 3-6/6-4/7-5 in the Girls Singles final.

In Doubles, Pavlyuchenkova was denied completing a Girls Doubles Grand Slam for '06 when she and Sharon Fichman were defeated in the final by the Romanian team of Mihaela Buzarnescu & Raluca Olaru. The Russian had won the Oz and Roland Garros titles with Fichman, and Wimbledon with Alisa Kleybanova.


**2006 JUNIOR SLAM CHAMPIONS**
[Girls]
Australian: Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova (RUS)
Roland Garros: Agnieszka Radwanska (POL)
Wimbledon: Caroline Wozniacki (DEN)
U.S. Open: Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova (RUS)

=TOP LATE-ROUND MATCH=
SF - Henin-Hardenne d. Jankovic
...4-6/6-4/6-0.
Jelena wasn't Maria. JHH looked ready to be sent home, with Jankovic up 6-4/4-2 and serving at 40/30. But a tiff with the chair umpire broke the Serbian's concentration. In the blink of an eye, her serve was broken, too. Jankovic never won another game. Even the easy going Jankovic (did her attempt to hide her smile when the crowd applauded the replay of her stretching leg split in the backcourt signal that she realized that she SHOULDN'T be laughing on the court during a U.S. Open SF match, although doing as such without an attack of conscious might be precisely the attitude that had helped turn around her results the last few weeks?) will have to struggle for a few days to forget about what she DIDN'T do in New York and instead focus on the great things she DID. Kind of like Justine, really. While she'll ultimately feel proud of having become the first player since Martina Hingis in 1997 to reach all four slam singles finals, who wants to wager that she'd rather have made just two if it meant she'd cached a pair of slam titles rather than the reality of the 1-3 slam final record that'll go into her '06 career bio. But down the stretch, as she grasps at the #1 ranking (she'd have overtaken Amelie Mauresmo had she won on Saturday) and "Player of the Year" honors, her current stretch of having made six straight singles finals (and 9-of-12 overall this season) will salve at least a few of her wounds... or maybe spur her on to attempt to reverse that 1-3 record in '07.

=BEST ENDING=
Martina Navratilova going out in grand slam style. Well, that is, if she STAYS retired this time... considering she DID say that she thought she could remain competitive on the court for another five years if she desired to make the effort.



...Henin would go on to claim the year-end #1 ranking at the season-ending championships, defeating both Sharapova (SF) and Mauresmo (Final) to take the title. It set the tone for her career season in '07, in which she went 63-4, won two slams (Roland Garros and the U.S. Open, giving her seven) and again finished #1. She retired in '08 while still the top-ranked player in the world (the first player to ever do so), only to come out of self-imposed exile to return to action in January of this year. She reached the Australian Open final in her first slam back. After injuring her elbow at Wimbledon, she's set to not play again until January '11.

Sharapova finished '06 at #2, only to be destroyed by Serena Williams in the Australian Open final the following January. A year later, she won her third slam singles crown in Melbourne with a win in the final over Ana Ivanovic. With Henin and Clijsters in retirement, she seemed poised to become the leading player on tour (or at least become Serena Williams' top rival). But a shoulder injury later that season (and eventual surgery) caused her to miss the end of the '08 campaign, as well as a large chunk of '09, and played havoc with her serve once she returned. While she's shown brief flashes of her former "Supernova" self, she's still trying to fully return to the form that made her the belle of the U.S. Open ball just four years ago.

From Sharapova and Henin, to Agassi and Navratilova, with Jankovic sprinkled in for some flavor, plotlines came busting out of New York in all shapes, sizes, ages, sexes and degrees of fun at the Open in '06. It was a satisfying dish of drama served fresh... for drama's sake. Who could ask a slam for more?

All for now.



PREVIOUS TIME CAPSULES:
1987 Roland Garros (Graf), 1987 Wimbledon (Navratilova/Cash), 1989 Roland Garros (Sanchez/Chang), 1990 Roland Garros (Seles/Gomez), 1990 Wimbledon (Navratilova), 1990 Wimbledon (Edberg/Becker), 1991 U.S. Open (Connors), 1993 Australian Open (Seles & Courier), 1993 Wimbledon (Graf/Novotna), 2003 & '05 U.S. Open (Henin/Clijsters), 2001-09 Australian Open (Dokic Down Under)

Read more...